MSGID: 1:154/10 66366e5e   
   REPLY: 2:221/6.0 66365ef0   
   PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux 2.4.5   
   CHRS: UTF-8 4   
   TZUTC: -0500   
   TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-02-05   
   On Sun, 5 May 2024 00:14:44 +0300, Tommi Koivula -> Nicholas Boel wrote:   
      
    >> BTW, is "@RFC-User-Agent:" a better choice over "NOTE:" according to   
    >> some such standards I don't care to read? I've noticed you recently   
    >> changed this.   
      
    TK> I wanted to "log" something from nntp client to kludges. So NOTE was   
    TK> changed to what the client sends.. Just for testing..   
      
    TK> X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64;   
    TK> x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/115.10   
    TK> X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;   
    TK> format=flowed   
    TK> X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit   
      
   Is that specific to Thunderbird and/or Sylpheed? I believe slrn and tin it   
   doesn't use or display "RFC". It just sends "User-Agent:", "Content-Type:",   
   and "Content-Transfer-Encoding:".   
      
   Regards,   
   Nick   
      
   ... Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.   
   --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderb   
    * Origin: _thePharcyde distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)   
   SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 120/616 123/10 124/5016   
   SEEN-BY: 128/260 135/220 225 153/757 7715 154/10 30 40 50 700 203/0   
   SEEN-BY: 218/700 220/90 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206   
   SEEN-BY: 229/317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464   
   SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5555 282/1038 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219   
   SEEN-BY: 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124   
   SEEN-BY: 467/888 633/280 712/848 770/1 2320/105 3634/12 5020/400 5054/30   
   PATH: 154/10 280/464 460/58 229/426