TID: FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.3-B20240503   
   TZUTC: 0300   
   CHRS: UTF-8 4   
   BBSID: KCO   
   RFC-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit   
   RFC-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed   
   NOTE: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101   
   Thunderbird/115.10.1   
   PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 kco 20240419   
   REPLY: 1:154/10 663659be   
   MSGID: 2:221/6.0 66365ef0   
   On 04.05.2024 15:52, Nicholas Boel wrote:   
      
   > On Sat, 4 May 2024 23:48:18 +0300, Tommi Koivula -> Nicholas Boel wrote:   
   >   
   >  TK> I think I've got it ok now. ;)   
   >   
   > That's good. I was worried about you for a second there. ;)   
      
   Sorry. ;D   
      
   > BTW, is "@RFC-User-Agent:" a better choice over "NOTE:" according to   
   > some such standards I don't care to read? I've noticed you recently   
   > changed this.   
      
   I wanted to "log" something from nntp client to kludges. So NOTE was changed   
   to what the client sends.. Just for testing..   
      
   X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64;   
   rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/115.10   
   X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed   
   X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit   
      
   'Tommi   
      
   --- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.3-B20240503   
    * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)   
   SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 135/220   
   SEEN-BY: 135/225 153/757 7715 154/10 30 203/0 218/700 840 221/0 1   
   SEEN-BY: 221/6 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 317 426 428 470   
   SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038   
   SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/66   
   SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124 467/888 633/280   
   SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 5020/400 1042 5054/30   
   PATH: 221/6 341/234 280/464 460/58 229/426