On 6/26/2012 9:09 PM, Bj”rn Felten -> Scott Street wrote:   
    SS>> Is that to say, that JamNNTPd needs a maintainer?   
      
    BF> Oh yes, it definitely is. Especially by someone who knows how to make   
    BF> the program more efficient. Let's not forget that this program is   
    BF> basically more than a decade old, written for the computers of   
    BF> yesteryears with compilers that didn't always perform as well as modern   
    BF> ditto.   
      
    SS>> Secondly, does anyone have a link to a how-to setup a Win32 build   
    SS>> environment that I can use to build test versions? And later releases?   
      
    BF> I'll dive down into my mail box and see if I can find Johan's tips from   
    BF> when I tried to compile under Windows.   
      
   Ok, I've finally gotten it.  In fact, this is the first post using my Windows   
   2003 based point - AND - JamNNTPd compiled with SMAPI and OpenSSL enabled!   
      
    BF> BTW, tomorrow is exactly eight years since I wrote the first message in   
    BF> this echo. Nostalgia buffs can still read the entire message base here   
    BF> at news://felten.yi.org/JAMNNTPD -- but be prepared for quite some wait   
    BF> before all the headers have been transmitted... 8-)   
      
   I did peek at your server, headers transferred fast enough - Its crazy that   
   you have messages that are that old.   
      
   It's late (1am), time to get some rest before another day of work.   
      
   Night all!   
   Scott   
      
   ---   
    * Origin: -=[ SSAlpha da'Point/win32 ]=- (1:266/420.1)