Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    JAMNNTPD    |    Support for the JAMNNTPD software client    |    2,630 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,549 of 2,630    |
|    Nicholas Boel to Carlos Navarro    |
|    space oddity (fixes)    |
|    21 Apr 24 14:32:06    |
      MSGID: 1:154/10 662569b0       REPLY: 2:341/234.1 66256447       PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux 2.4.1       CHRS: UTF-8 4       TZUTC: -0500       TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-02-05       Hello Carlos,              On Mon, Apr 22 2024 00:08:32 +0000, you wrote:               NB>> Or while using HotdogEd with flowed=off, it still wraps at the 72/79        NB>> columns set by jam/smapinntpd, which then HotdogEd would still wrap        NB>> the text early because it doesn't have that many columns on the        NB>> screen?               CN> Yes, but it does the same with both flowed off and on (format=flowed and        CN> format=fixed look almost identical on readers that don't support f=f).        CN> If you use it in horizontal view, or on a larger screen like a tablet,        CN> it looks better.              Which is why I'm wondering if the wrap is set in HotdogEd for 79 characters by       default. Then it would obviously have that issue when using a phone with only       ~58 character width available.               CN> I think we had seen that tin does support f=f, at least it removed        CN> stuffed spaces. Does it wrap paragraphs at more than 72 chars, or are        CN> they adjusted to the screen width?              I tested tin on the tin nntp server that contained very old messages. However,       this was the only time I saw paragraphs adjusted to the screen width. Anything       that has come through jam/smapinntpd has been wrapped at 72-79 characters.               CN> Also, what about slrn?              I have never seen paragraphs adjusted to screen width with slrn, BUT I haven't       tried anything else besides jam/smapinntpd with it, either. I will have to       test that and see.               CN> It may be that they send paragraphs as long lines, instead of breaking        CN> them into several lines with soft-wrapping trailing spaces as in        CN> format=flowed. Smapi/JamNNTPd properly handles both formats when posting        CN> to the messagebase.               NB>> So is it a HotdogEd problem that you're looking to come up with a work        NB>> around for, specifically?               CN> No, it may be good for other newsreaders too. If I'm not mistaken,        CN> Smapi/JamNNTPd would work like other NNTP servers do.              I think with what I just described above (where I've seen screen width       paragraphs outside of jam/smapinntpd), I see now where you guys are pointing       out the difference against a "real" NNTP server.              Some clients probably don't understand the 'soft-wrapping trailing spaces', or       don't care to put them back together to re-form long lines, but can handle       long lines themselves just fine. Am I understanding what you are describing       here, now?              Regards,       Nick              ... Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.       --- slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (FreeBSD)        * Origin: _thePharcyde distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)       SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 120/616 123/10 124/5016       SEEN-BY: 128/260 135/220 225 153/757 7715 154/10 30 40 50 700 203/0       SEEN-BY: 218/700 220/90 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206       SEEN-BY: 229/307 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464       SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5555 282/1038 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219       SEEN-BY: 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 467/888       SEEN-BY: 633/267 280 412 418 2744 712/848 770/1 2320/105 3634/12 5020/400       PATH: 154/10 280/464 633/280 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca