Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    JAMNNTPD    |    Support for the JAMNNTPD software client    |    2,630 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 239 of 2,630    |
|    mark lewis to Scott Street    |
|    xlat bug?    |
|    23 Jun 12 15:22:13    |
      > Other then that, newsreaders of all kinds are happy with iso8859-1.       > Having said that, it is possible to /force/ a character set in JamNNTPd       > on the area definition line. One could force all postings in iso8859-1       > if so desired.               SS> Correction : One can force the posting, IF one creates a UTF-8 to        SS> CP850 table -- however, it will have to drop characters or make a        SS> whole bunch of 'assumptions' and bad ones at that.              right... this is what i ran into when i started to convert back from utf-8 to       CP437... i also started to convert between CP437 and windows-1251 but there       are definitely specific character slots that are blank in windows-1251... i       highly detest seeing the CP437 ascii box drawning characters being translated       to + - and |... i've detested if for many years and only now see a possibility       but extremely slim :?               SS> Somehow we (the collective fidonet developers) need to address the        SS> character set problem. New systems will continue to develop and        SS> from what I see on the horizon; these systems will even be more        SS> UTF-8 and perhaps UTF-16 dependent.               utf-8 is really all that's needed... i'm not aware of any specifics in utf-16       that utf-8 can't handle in today's world...               SS> Secondly, backward compatibility is great for transitional times;         SS> but we must cut off the old stuff so that the new generation of        SS> Fidonet can evolve without the restrictions of unsupported &        SS> abandoned software.              i'm not so sure about this... what about systems set up for nostalgia? are       they to be cut off and not be able to participate? the Radio Shack Color       Computer 3 (aka the Coco 3), Apple //, Apple //e, and other so called       "ancient" machines can still join fidonet and participate in today's       discussions... even old main frames if someone has the pocket book to fund       their power consumption ;)              )\/(ark               * Origin: (1:3634/12)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca