MSGID: 3:640/1384.125 5d5494a0   
   REPLY: 2:335/364 5d54387a   
   PID: JamNNTPd/Linux 1   
   CHRS: UTF-8 2   
   TZUTC: 1000   
   TID: CrashMail II/Linux 0.71   
   Hi! Fabio,   
      
   On 08/15/2019 02:36 AM, you wrote:   
    FB> Il Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:59:30 +0300, Tommi Koivula -> Paul Quinn ha   
    FB> scritto:   
      
      
    >> I have three JamNNTPd's running in 32bit systems. They all work fine.   
      
    FB> OK, this is a 32 bit jamnntpd server running on a 64 bit system, Cthulhu   
    FB> accept my sacrifice and let the TO field populated! :D   
      
   Crikey-Moses!  You're not having any good luck.  If it's your own compile, and   
   you're actually replying to Tommi's message, then your JamNNTPd is not   
   honouring the Fidonet bits.  That's something I noticed in a previous message   
   too.   
      
   When I looked around for a binary back in 2011 to run in Xubuntu/32 10.04 LTS,   
   I put aside the newly-compiled binary and went back to using an older project   
   I did in Puppy Liunx 4.12 (Linux 2.6.xx).  It worked... properly.   
      
   I was also using Puppy-compiled binaries for CrashMail (before FMail32/lnx),   
   rather than new compiles.  They work especially well in 32bit VMs too.   
      
   Can I interest you in some old favourites?   
      
   Cheers,   
   Paul.   
      
   --- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0   
    * Origin: So where the bloody hell are you?!? (3:640/1384.125)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/2 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 242 360 226/17 227/114   
   SEEN-BY: 229/275 354 426 452 1014 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 280/464   
   SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5555 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 640/305   
   SEEN-BY: 640/1321 1384 3634/12   
   PATH: 640/1384 221/1 280/464 229/426