REPLY: 39.fido_jamnntpd@1:135/371 219e2925   
   MSGID: 2:221/360 5d3bf8fa   
   CHRS: LATIN-1 2   
   TZUTC: 0300   
   TID: hpt/w64-mvcdll 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08   
   Hi Eric.   
      
   24 Jul 19 20:08:30, you wrote to me:   
      
    ER>   Re: The latest official release   
    ER>   By: Tommi Koivula to Fabio Bizzi on Tue Jul 23 2019 05:21 pm   
      
    TK>> Have you tried SmapiNNTPd? Compiles and runs nice in 64bit LInux. :)   
      
    ER> Nice! I just made my CentOS 7.6 smapinntpd.spec to compile it and am   
   prepping   
    ER> to try it out myself.   
      
   +1   
      
    ER> One thing I noted was that somewhere it said not to use hpt pack, which I   
    ER> understand that's only packing netmail, per hpt docs.   
      
   Yes, there's nothing wrong with packing jamnntpd netmail. :)   
      
    ER> I wonder if this'll be any problem with sqpack...... Since it's being   
    ER> mentioned about packing netmail already can be problematic. ;)   
      
   You can pack and purge message bases as long as you make sure the messages do   
   not get renumbered. I studied this some time ago. One of the husky programs,   
   hptutil or sqpack, is ok to pack squish base but not jam. I cannot remember   
   which one. :)   
      
   'Tommi   
      
   ---   
    * Origin: rbb.fidonet.fi (2:221/360)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/2 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 360 226/17 227/114 229/354   
   SEEN-BY: 229/426 452 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 280/464 5003 5555 310/31   
   SEEN-BY: 317/3 322/757 342/200   
   PATH: 221/0 1 280/464 229/426