Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    JAMNNTPD    |    Support for the JAMNNTPD software client    |    2,630 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,689 of 2,630    |
|    Nicholas Boel to Paul Quinn    |
|    What?    |
|    17 Dec 16 11:24:28    |
      Hello Paul,              On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 19:30:46 +1000, Paul Quinn -> Nicholas Boel wrote:               PQ> There does appear to be netmail.jam support. I use it here and on my        PQ> main system, with scripts & BATches.              Does it place the proper netmail information in the specied "echomailjam"       parameter so there is only one file to contend with? The JamNNTPd       configuration file doesn't seem to mention a separate file for netmail.jam. Or       does it actually create a netmail.jam separately?               PQ> OTOH, my Linux script uses a fall-through approach when looking for        PQ> those semaphores/data files; that is to say that it attempts using named        PQ> *.jam files as arguments, and if none are found it does a mass scan out        PQ> in any case.              In my adventures, I'm trying to avoid that. With my Golded/hpt setup, I have       hpt creating echotoss.log and Golded creating echoscan.log. Then in my script       I use "hpt scan -f" which looks for one of those files, and if not found, it       doesn't continue to run. I'm running it all on a Raspberry Pi3 so while I       tinker I'm also looking for ways to save resources wherever possible (not that       it's a huge deal or anything).              So with JamNNTPd, I would like to do something similar with the .jam files.       More likely writing a wrapper script that runs my newsreader client (slrn),       and then when I actually exit the program will continue to do a search for       those .jam files and run my tosser if they're found. That way I don't have to       run a script with cron or anything that most of the time wouldn't even do       anything when no messages are posted from here. And the need to scan all areas       when those files are not found wouldn't be necessary either.              Thanks for the info, Paul!              Regards,       Nick              --- slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)        * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (1:154/10)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca