On 09/14/2016 04:06 AM, Paul Quinn -> rick christian wrote:   
    PQ> Hi! rick,   
    PQ> I'm running three systems with CM 0.71: two nodes and a third test   
    PQ> config. My view of CM is if you intend to eventually feed other nodes or   
    PQ> zones, then forget it. It has been my experience that it seems useless   
    PQ> for anything other than as the tosser on a 'leaf' node with no other   
    PQ> links, i.e. as a terminal endpoint.   
      
   Why??? And Yes I eventually will need to have support to feed downstream   
   and/or other nodes and probably a private net and get feeds for LinuxNET, as I   
   have plans for some things, basically to revive some of the things I was doing   
   when I ran my original node 1:129/220... I am tied of the filth that is/has   
   ruined one of my passions, and the website and greed that has ruined things....   
      
   I have crashmail that comes from apt-get on buntu's 14.04 ESR   
      
   I have the manual from the other site github or something... but crashmail   
   doesn't seem to generate PKT's when I do   
      
   crashmail SETTINGS crashmail.prefs SCAN   
      
   Even though it says it is...   
      
   CrashMail II 0.71 started successfully!   
   Scanning all areas for messages to export   
   Scanning area NETMAIL   
   Exporting message #9 from "Rick Christian" to "Eric Renfro" at 1:135/0   
   Is in HandleMessage()   
   Importing message   
      
   1 message exported   
   Scanning for orphan files   
   Scanning for old packets   
   Scanning for new files to pack   
   CrashMail end   
      
      
    PQ> Plan 'B': grab HPT (and all that it requires, if you can sort through   
    PQ> the nonsense dependencies). Oh, still, the Ubuntu Software Center may   
    PQ> have something.[shrug] I haven't looked.   
      
      
   Thanks, but dragging in Husky and all its excess baggage is not really a plan   
   or option, as eventually I would like to put my FTN mailer on a Pi to let it   
   run on its own with a shared file system for Golded to read from...   
      
   If I was going to use Husky I may as well just run DOSBox and setup FD, but   
   since my local net uses Binkd and I need binkp that is not an option. Or even   
   go dig out the telebits and V.90/92 modems in the shed and run it that way....   
      
    * Origin: news://news.wpusa.dynip.com | acct req'd to post (1:3634/12)