Hi! Tommi,   
      
   On 04/02/2016 05:32 PM, you wrote to David Drummond:   
      
    DD>> @PID: JamNNTPd/Linux 1   
    DD>> @TID: CrashMail II/Linux 0.71   
      
    TK> You are using the same combination of software: JamNNTPd and Crashmail   
    TK> II on linux. Do you have a solution to Paul's seenby-problem?   
      
    DD>>  * Origin: Cleveland QLD AUS (3:640/305)   
    DD>> @PATH: 640/305 384 1384 221/0   
      
   It would/will suit his situation.  Whilst the CM Windows/32 0.71 version may   
   work exceedingly well for Björn, the CM Linux 0.71 version seems to have a   
   'leaf node' fixation.   
      
   I have compiled a CM Linux 1.5 version which totally blew 11 existing JAM   
   areas during the test period.  It most likely would be fine creating its own   
   messagebase, but, who amongst us would re-invent another wheel.[rhet]  Not   
   this little black duck.   
      
   This afternoon I experimented with a fresh compile of the CM Linux 0.71   
   version.  It's performing so well that I've left it in place.  I should add   
   that it did */not/* grow out of the leaf node brain fart.  Yes, it's doing   
   exactly the same thing as the OOtB copy did.   
      
   I'm looking for a replacement: HPT or?  Not much of a choice, hunh...   
      
   Cheers,   
   Paul.   
      
   --- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0   
    * Origin: Paul's other Linux vBox - Maryborough, Qld, OZ (3:640/1384)