-=> Bo Simonsen wrote to Michiel van der Vlist <=-   
      
    BS> Yeah.. but not that I like this situation but I really think something   
    BS> serious must happen before the ISPs are being forced to use IPv6 on   
    BS> wide-spread basis.   
      
   I'm waiting for home routers to build in IPV6/IPV4 gateways - the network    
   can go IPV6, people will still have a NAT-ed private class C address on the    
   inside. It doesn't get the user any of the perks of a full IPV6 network,   
   (like getting rid of NAT) but it's cheap and easy to implement. I can    
   imagine the ISPs pushing something like this instead of opening up the    
   network.   
      
   	kurt weiske | kweiske at realitycheckbbs dot org   
   	            | http://realitycheckbbs.org   
      
      
   ... "Proximity alert. Must be coming up on something."    
   --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32   
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | information is power. (1:218/700)