>  JD> I thought I read someplace that Irex has some proprietory code    
    >  JD> (licensend or permission to use) that cannot be distributed as    
    >  JD> open source.   
    >   
    > that's possible... in which case, those libraries can be left out    
    > and the code will fail to compile until they are replaced...   
      
    JD> And that may be a problem.    
      
   why? once one knows the name of the missing routines, they can either be   
   replaced or recreated... it may even be that there's already a replacement   
   library for the commercial one that was used...   
      
   either way, the missing routines /can/ be replaced if they are truly   
   necessary...   
      
   )\/(ark   
      
   ---    
    * Origin:  (1:3634/12.42)