01 Oct 12 02:34, Nicholas Boel wrote to Roy Witt:   
      
      
    RW>  NB>> I know this is probably old news, but was the developer ever   
    RW>  NB>> asked for the linux source code? I mean, it's so old, outdated,   
    RW>  NB>> and hardly works.. I couldn't see as to why he wouldn't give it   
    RW>  NB>> up unless he lost it, which most seem to do eventually when   
    RW>  NB>> they abandon it for so long. :(   
    RW>>   
    RW>> At one point, someone in the same net asked Charles if he still had   
    RW>> the source and the answer was yes. That doesn't mean he hasn't lost   
    RW>> it in the meantime. However, I doubt that he'd release it even if   
    RW>> you could get in touch with him these days.   
      
    NB> That's pretty sad that (assuming he still has it) he wouldn't release   
    NB> it to the very small percentage of people left in this hobby. It's   
    NB> not like he's going to make much more money on registration codes,   
    NB> since there's a plethora of them, well known to many, out there   
    NB> already. :(   
      
   I agree with that, but I'm in no position to 'talk' him into releasing   
   the source. I'd discourage anyone from registering irex and just persue   
   using the unregistered version or looking into offering to buy someone   
   else's key. This isn't anything new, as I was given a key generator for   
   FastEcho 1.46 which can open that program for max use...   
      
                   R\%/itt   
      
      
   ... Mark Owen: "Hey, did you ever hear anything about that beer?   
   ... Fellow SEAL: "You believed that s**t, I bet you voted for change too,   
   ... SUCKER."   
      
      
   --- GoldED+/W32 with D'Bridge 3.82   
    * Origin: Texas Lone-Star - Texan, American, USAian  (1:387/22)