Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    IREX    |    Internet Rex (FTN <=> Internet) Public S    |    1,458 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 112 of 1,458    |
|    Michiel van der Vlist to Simon Phillips    |
|    re [2]: W7 + REX v2.29    |
|    05 Nov 10 22:27:36    |
      Hello Simon,              On Wednesday November 03 2010 22:31, you wrote to Marc Lewis:               SP> Hope you and others don't mind me butting in here. I would not claim        SP> to be particularly knowledgeable about IREX, but as I work in the        SP> networking area I would make a few comments about the IPv4        SP> 'exhaustion' situation. There are three things that stand in the way        SP> of actual exhaustion of IPv4 space.              Instead of giving you an in-dept reply, I will just direct you to some experts       on the matter og IPv4 exhaustion.               SP> 1/ RFC1918 address ranges (10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255, etc.)        SP> 2/ Network Address Translation (NAT)                     NAT won't save you from the need to switch to IPv6:       http://tinyurl.com/26klu33               SP> There are also lots of IP's that are nominally allocated, but        SP> although once used, are in fact unused, and could be reclaimed if        SP> necessary. This has already happened in the case of a few A-class        SP> ranges, including some used for Australian cable internet providers.              Reclaiming unused addresses will be a time consuming process with lots of       legal proceduers giving us only a few month extra:              http://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2010-09/exhaustguide.html               SP> And finally, even if all of these factors were somehow overcome and        SP> address space were exhausted anyway and people began to take up IPv6,        SP> eventually to the exclusion of v4, IPv6 can be made to run an IPv4        SP> tunnel, so the solution to run IREX and the like is just to build a v4        SP> over v6 tunnel and use that.              To run an OPv4 only server, you will need a public IPv4 address, An RFC1918       address won't do as that is not globally routable.               SP> Now that I have weighed into this debate, would there be any pointers        SP> that I could follow on fixing my internal error 11 with IREX? :)              The Linux version has a problem woth the DNS resolver. The the only way is to       enter the raw IP address of the destination instead of the symbolic host       name...                     Cheers, Michiel              --- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20070503        * Origin: http://www.vlist.org (2:280/5555)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca