Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    IPV6    |    The convoluted hot-mess that is IPV6    |    4,612 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,423 of 4,612    |
|    Dan Clough to Michiel van der Vlist    |
|    Re: New rule    |
|    26 Jul 25 08:37:22    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 1740.fido_ipv6@1:135/115 2cea16de       REPLY: 2:280/5555 688487f5       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/8c7887462 Jul 18 2025 GCC 14.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.29-Linux master/8c7887462 Jul 18 2025 GCC 14.2.0       BBSID: PALANTIR       CHRS: CP437 2       FORMAT: flowed       -=> Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Nick Boel <=-               NB> I think at this point applications are accepted as long as applicants        NB> can make a binkp connection, and send a netmail.               MvV> Yes that seems to be the case. But once they are accepted, they are        MvV> seldom checked again. If checked, only for a responding server, not for        MvV> responding to netmail. So we have many ghost systems in the nodelist...              I'd say that is the fault of the NC. There are no dead nodes in my Net.               MvV> Still... As I mentioned before, when promoting IPv6 in Fidonet I        MvV> sometimes run into a brick wall. The first brick wall is that of        MvV> denial. No, denial is not a river in Egypt. (Roy Witt) IPv6 is a hype,        MvV> there is noo need for it, IPv4 is functioning well and will remain to        MvV> do so, if not for the rest of the century, then at least for the coming        MvV> decades.              Is there anything in the above paragraph that isn't true?              That's correct, it's all true and factual.               MvV> IPv4 exhaustion may not be a serious problem for the incumbents in        MvV> parts of the world where IPv4 was historically issued as if it would        MvV> last forever. But for newcomers getting enough IPv4 to give all their        MvV> potential customers a globally routable IPv4 address is a serious        MvV> problem. So serious that some of the newcomers in the fast gowing fibre        MvV> glass sector here in Europe have stopped doing it.              So..... here you are talking about "newcomer" ISP's? That doesn't have        anything to do with individuals or FidoNet sysops. Are you trying to        base your whole argument on the problems faced by a "new ISP company"?        I mean, how many of those are there....? Nothing to do with FidoNet.                            ... So easy, a child could do it. Child sold separately.       === MultiMail/Linux v0.52       --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux        * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115)       SEEN-BY: 1/120 10/0 1 18/0 103/705 104/117 105/81 106/201 123/0 25       SEEN-BY: 123/180 755 3001 3002 124/5016 128/187 129/14 135/0 115 205       SEEN-BY: 135/220 240 363 385 390 391 153/757 7715 154/10 30 110 203/0       SEEN-BY: 214/22 218/0 1 215 610 620 700 860 220/6 221/0 222/2 226/30       SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 206 317 400 426 428 550 616 664 700 705 240/1120       SEEN-BY: 240/5832 250/1 263/1 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 5555 291/111       SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200       SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 460/58 467/888 633/280 712/848 1321 770/1       SEEN-BY: 902/26 3634/0 12 56 57 60 5020/400 545       PATH: 135/115 3634/12 222/2 263/1 280/464 103/705 218/700 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca