TID: FMail-W32 2.3.0.1-B20240319   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0200   
   CHRS: CP850 2   
   MSGID: 2:280/5555 66f86a9a   
   REPLY: 2:5001/100.1 66f84e36   
   Hello Dmitry,   
      
   On Saturday September 28 2024 19:30, you wrote to me:   
      
    DP> BinkpAbstractConnector Protocol version 1.1 28-09-24 17:23:08   
    DP> [00007394] BinkpAsyncConnector  Frame received: [ M_ADR   
    DP> 2:280/5555@fidonet ] 28-09-24 17:23:08 [00007394]   
    DP> BinkpAbstractConnector Invalid address 28-09-24 17:23:08 [00007394]   
    DP> NodelistScanner      Using nodelist file nodelist 28-09-24 17:23:08   
    DP> [00007394] BinkpAbstractConnector Local error: No valid address   
    DP> specified   
      
   AH, I see. You refuse connections with unlisted systems. There is a flag for   
   that, the LO flag. You do not carry that flag in the nodelist. So....   
      
   Whatever, it will be fixed in a couple of hours.   
      
    DP> @PATH: 280/5555 5020/1042 4441 5001/100   
      
    DP> Looks like 2:5020/1042 deserves a punishment..   
      
   For what?   
      
    DP> And you are even not allowed no post here :)   
      
   Says who?   
      
   Cheers, Michiel   
      
   --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303   
    * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)   
   SEEN-BY: 19/10 90/1 103/705 104/117 105/81 106/201 124/5016 153/757   
   SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 30 203/0 218/700 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/110   
   SEEN-BY: 229/114 206 317 400 426 428 470 550 616 664 700 240/1120   
   SEEN-BY: 240/5832 250/1 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 5555 282/1038 291/111   
   SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200   
   SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 460/58 467/888 633/267 280 281 410 412 418   
   SEEN-BY: 633/420 509 2744 712/848 770/1 5020/400 545 1042 5053/58   
   SEEN-BY: 5075/35   
   PATH: 280/5555 464 633/280 229/426