TID: FMail-lnx64 2.2.0.0   
   BBSID: KCO   
   TZUTC: 0200   
   CHRS: UTF-8 4   
   EID: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101   
   Thunderbird/102.9.0.   
   PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20230305   
   REPLY: 2:280/5555 641daa1d   
   MSGID: 2:221/6.0 641db2ee   
   On 24.3.2023 15.39, Michiel van der Vlist wrote:   
      
   > In the case of he.net the bussines model was spreading IPv6 so that   
   > they could make money on those needing help getting their bussines   
   > running on IPv6. There are indications that their free tunnels may   
   > not last forever.   
   >   
   > Route48? Frankly I know very little about them. But whatever their   
   > bussines model was, it apparently didn't work...   
      
   Don't know about business model, but route48 was nice because they offered   
   tunnel by wireguard. Wireguard doesn't need public ipv4.   
      
   They also had a server in Finland. :)   
      
   'Tommi   
      
   --- FMail-lnx64 2.2.0.0   
    * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 90/1 104/117 105/81 106/201 123/131 124/5016 153/757   
   SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/1 6 360 226/30 227/114   
   SEEN-BY: 229/110 111 112 113 206 307 317 400 424 426 428 452 470 550   
   SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 230/0 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5006   
   SEEN-BY: 280/5555 282/1038 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219   
   SEEN-BY: 322/757 335/364 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/81 120 460/58   
   SEEN-BY: 633/267 280 281 410 412 418 420 509 712/848 770/1 4500/1   
   SEEN-BY: 5020/545 1042   
   PATH: 221/6 1 280/464 633/280 229/426