TID: FMail-W32 2.1.3.7-B20170919   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   CHRS: CP850 2   
   MSGID: 2:280/5555 61dc4ca4   
   REPLY: 2:203/2 61dc4752   
   Hello Bj”rn,   
      
   On Monday January 10 2022 15:48, you wrote to me:   
      
    MvdV>> Just one /64 would not be satisfactory to me.   
      
    BF>    Doesn't a /64 contain 2^64 addresses? Not enough? The entire IPv4   
    BF> pool is 2^32...   
      
   It is not that 2^64 addresses are not enough for all my devices, it is that a   
   /64 can not be divided into subnets. That is the way it is designed. A /64 is   
   the smallest subnet. I might have designed it different but I was not involved   
   at the time.   
      
   So... if one wants/needs more than one subnet, one needs more than one /64.   
   That is the way it is.   
      
   It should be no problem, there is enough for everyone.   
      
      
   Cheers, Michiel   
   --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303   
    * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 19/10 30/0 80/1 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131   
   SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 226/30 229/110 424 426 428   
   SEEN-BY: 229/550 664 700 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 400 250/1 266/512   
   SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 5006 5555 282/464 1038 301/0 1 101 113 812 310/31   
   SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 640/1384   
   SEEN-BY: 712/848 920/1 2452/250 5019/40 5020/545 1042 12000 5053/58   
   SEEN-BY: 5058/104   
   PATH: 280/5555 301/1 229/426