Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    IPV6    |    The convoluted hot-mess that is IPV6    |    4,612 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,755 of 4,612    |
|    Scott Street to Victor Sudakov    |
|    A small questionary on ISPs    |
|    24 Oct 21 11:23:02    |
   
   REPLY: 2:5005/49 6174fdcc   
   MSGID: 1:266/420 617581ae   
   PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20180707   
   CHRS: UTF8 2   
   TZUTC: -0400   
   TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2021-05-15   
   Hello Victor!   
      
   24 Oct 21 13:26, you wrote to me:   
      
      
    SS>>>> inet6 2601:48:c500:9340::c0e3 prefixlen 60 dynamic   
    VS>>> This is very interesting. Why "prefixlen 60" on the LAN?   
      
    VS> Whatever Comcast's intentions, are you sure that a LAN with a   
    VS> prefixlen different from /64 will work properly? Will a non-standard   
    VS> prefix not break SLAAC and other things?   
      
    VS> This is where my theoretical knowledge is lacking, but I've always   
    VS> been warned against using anything different from /64 on a LAN   
    VS> segment.   
      
   The gateway and my dozen+ devices do not seem to have any issues getting   
   dynamic IPv6 addresses, and since most are Apple, IPv6 is the prefered   
   connection method. As an "end-user", I don't know why Comcast has chosen to   
   give my network MORE address space; like 1800000000000000000+ addresses wasn't   
   enough; they've given me 295000000000000000000+ addresses.   
      
   In reality, for an end user network, /96 is plenty with 2^32 addreses, and   
   /112 is even more reasonable with 2^16 addresses; especially when you compare   
   it to the default settings on every consumer IPv4 gateway with 2^8 addresses.   
      
   I found this nice table from IBM on IP address subnet masks: htt   
   s://www.ibm.com/docs/en/ts3500-tape-library?topic=formats-subnet   
   masks-ipv4-prefixes-ipv6   
   (its odd that they buried it in a tape library document, but almighty Google   
   found it! - Google KNOWS EVERYTHING!) :)   
      
      
   Cheers,   
      
   Scott   
      
      
   ---   
    * Origin: -={ The Digital Post }=- (1:266/420)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 19/36 90/1 105/81 106/201 116/18 120/331 340 123/131   
   SEEN-BY: 124/5016 128/2 134/100 153/135 757 7715 154/10 203/0 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 221/0 6 226/30 227/702 229/424 426 428 550 664 700 230/0   
   SEEN-BY: 230/150 152 240/5138 5411 5824 5832 5853 249/206 317 400   
   SEEN-BY: 250/1 261/38 100 263/1 266/420 512 267/155 275/100 280/464   
   SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5006 5555 282/1038 1056 291/100 111 292/854 8125   
   SEEN-BY: 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 340/400 341/66 234 342/200   
   SEEN-BY: 423/120 460/58 633/280 640/1321 712/848 770/1 801/189 2320/105   
   SEEN-BY: 2452/250 2454/119 3634/12 5020/545   
   PATH: 266/420 512 261/38 153/757 280/464 240/5832 229/426   
      
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca