TZUTC: -0400   
   MSGID: 167.fidonet_ipv6@1:142/103 25ac6c65   
   REPLY: 2:280/5555 61464f9e   
   PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Linux  Aug 23 2020 GCC 6.3.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.11-Linux r3.177 Aug 23 2020 GCC 6.3.0   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   Hello Michiel;   
      
   -=> Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Brian Rogers <=-   
      
    MvV> There I only partly agree. Sure, many things are the same or similar in   
    MvV> IPv4 and IPv6. But I also find that many newcomers to IPv6 have   
    MvV> difficulty to get rid of "IPv4 think". To let go of the idea that NAT   
    MvV> is "security" and that IPv6 is insecure because it does not use NAT is   
    MvV> something that needs to sink in. Also it takes a while to realize that   
    MvV> there is no need to be greedy when assigning addresses. There are 2^64   
    MvV> addresses in a subnet...   
      
   I was more focusing on some of the tools available however when it comes to   
   some of the other things such as subnetting, security and such yes it's   
   slightly different than IPv4. One thing IPv6 uses is NDP vs ARP in IPv4.   
      
    MvV> There is more than one road that leads to Rome...   
      
   Absolutely! In this case it doesn't matter if you're talking IPv4 or IPv6.   
      
      
      
   ... Verbal agreements frequently lead to verbal disagreements.   
   --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52   
    * Origin: SBBS - Carnage! 2001:470:8a1e::3 (1:142/103)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/19 123 16/0 30/0 80/1 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/130 131 124/5016   
   SEEN-BY: 142/0 103 153/757 154/10 201/0 203/0 2 124 221/0 1 6 226/30   
   SEEN-BY: 227/702 229/424 426 428 550 664 700 230/0 240/1120 5832 249/206   
   SEEN-BY: 249/317 400 261/38 280/464 5003 5006 5555 282/464 1038 292/854   
   SEEN-BY: 292/8125 301/0 1 101 113 812 310/31 317/3 320/119 219 319   
   SEEN-BY: 322/0 757 342/200 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 920/1   
   SEEN-BY: 2452/250 3634/24 5020/545 1042 5058/104   
   PATH: 142/103 320/219 203/0 280/464 301/1 229/426