TID: FMail-W32 2.1.3.7-B20170919   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0200   
   CHRS: CP850 2   
   MSGID: 2:280/5555 6141e290   
   REPLY: 2:5005/49 6140b56d   
   Hello Victor,   
      
   On Tuesday September 14 2021 21:40, you wrote to Brian Rogers:   
      
    BR>> You can always get a tunneled IPv6 block free from HE.net and   
    BR>> tell your ISP to piss off. That's what I basically did and I've   
    BR>> been fine since.   
      
    VS> That's what I've done, but it results in a lower bandwidth over IPv6,   
    VS> and extra hops.   
      
   A tunnel is good, native IPv6 is better. I noticed it too when I used tunnels.   
   IPv6 over the tunnel is significantky slower than IPv4. Up to 50% slower.   
   Native IPv6 is always preferable so we we should all keep perstering our ISPs   
   about IPv6.   
      
    VS> The bandwidth is so much lower that browsers tend to fall back to IPv4   
      
   I haven't seen that particular problem.   
      
    VS> (Yes I know there is a tweak to stop this behaviour in Firefox,   
    VS> nevertheless my IPv6 connection is inferior to IPv4).   
      
   As I said: native is preferable, but a tunnel is better than no IPv6 at all.   
      
      
   Cheers, Michiel   
      
      
   --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303   
    * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 19/10 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 203/0 221/0 6 226/30   
   SEEN-BY: 227/702 229/424 426 428 550 664 700 240/5138 5411 5824 5832   
   SEEN-BY: 240/5853 249/206 317 400 250/1 280/464 5003 5006 5555 282/1038   
   SEEN-BY: 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 460/58 633/280   
   SEEN-BY: 640/1384 712/848 2452/250 2454/119 5019/40 5020/545 1042   
   SEEN-BY: 5020/12000 5053/58   
   PATH: 280/5555 240/5832 229/426