MSGID: 2:280/464.47 6017f420   
   REPLY: 2:280/5555 6017de93   
   PID: JamNNTPd/Linux 1   
   CHRS: LATIN-1 2   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   TID: CrashMail II/Linux 1.7   
   Michiel wrote (2021-02-01):   
      
    MvdV> *) Coming to think of it... Full IPv6 connectivity is better of course,   
    MvdV> but when having to choose between "OO" and "IO", Outgoing only is   
   better.   
    MvdV> While in the near future we will see nodes that are connectable via IPv6   
    MvdV> but no longer can accept incoming IPv4 (INO4), alll these nodes will   
   stay   
    MvdV> have outgoing IPv4 for a long time. So your "OO" node can still have   
   full   
    MvdV> two way connectivity with those "INO4" nodes. An "IO" node only has one   
    MvdV> way connectivity with "INO4" nodes.   
      
   If you only have IPv4 connectivity you can still use a Tor proxy (or some   
   other proxy/way) to connect to IPv6 nodes. Adding incoming IPv6 is much harder.   
      
   Btw, what's the point of OO only nodes in the list? I'm sure many more nodes   
   can connect over IPv6 nowadays.   
      
   ---   
    * Origin: . (2:280/464.47)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016 154/10 203/0 221/0   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/702 229/424 426 550 664 1016 240/5138 5411 5824   
   SEEN-BY: 240/5832 5853 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 5006 5555 292/854   
   SEEN-BY: 292/8125 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 423/120 460/58   
   SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 770/1 2452/250 2454/119 5020/545   
   PATH: 280/464 240/5832 229/426