TID: FMail-W32 2.1.3.7-B20170919   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   CHRS: CP850 2   
   MSGID: 2:280/5555 6017de93   
   REPLY: 1:229/664 44904d3a   
   Hello Jay,   
      
   On Sunday January 31 2021 19:58, you wrote to me:   
      
    Mv>>   ... if there really is no way to open ports for incoming IPv6   
    Mv>> that would be a show stopper for me. I'd want my money back...   
      
    JH> Yup, for $499 plus tax (on sale) it just doesn't seem to be worth the   
    JH> money.   
      
   That's a lot of money... Are you sure there is no way to open an IPv6 port?   
   Have you contacted the manufacturer?   
      
    JH> P.S:  IPV6 is working otherwise, so I can indeed still poll for mail   
    JH> via IPv6 just not accept incoming connections.   
      
   OK, I will flag your listing as "OO" then. It is better than nothing.  *)   
      
      
   *) Coming to think of it... Full IPv6 connectivity is better of course, but   
   when having to choose between "OO" and "IO", Outgoing only is better. While in   
   the near future we will see nodes that are connectable via IPv6 but no longer   
   can accept incoming IPv4 (INO4), alll these nodes will stay have outgoing IPv4   
   for a long time. So your "OO" node can still have full two way connectivity   
   with those "INO4" nodes. An "IO" node only has one way connectivity with   
   "INO4" nodes.   
      
      
   Cheers, Michiel   
      
   --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303   
    * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 19/10 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 203/0 221/0 6 226/30   
   SEEN-BY: 227/702 229/424 426 550 664 1016 240/5138 5411 5824 5832   
   SEEN-BY: 240/5853 249/206 317 400 250/1 280/464 5003 5006 5555 310/31   
   SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 460/58 633/280 640/1384 712/848   
   SEEN-BY: 2452/250 2454/119 5019/40 5020/545 1042 12000 5053/58   
   PATH: 280/5555 240/5832 229/426