home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   IPV6      The convoluted hot-mess that is IPV6      4,612 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,398 of 4,612   
   Tony Langdon to Victor Sudakov   
   Re: Down Temporarily   
   31 Jan 21 19:01:00   
   
   TZUTC: 1100   
   MSGID: 1671.fido-ipv6@3:633/410 247bb59b   
   REPLY: 2:5005/49 601639c2   
   PID: Synchronet 3.17c-Linux  Nov  3 2019 GCC 4.6.3   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.10-Linux r3.146 Nov  3 2019 GCC 4.6.3   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   -=> On 01-31-21 11:53, Victor Sudakov wrote to Jay Harris <=-   
      
    VS> I have been always of the opinion that port forwarding is never needed   
    VS> in IPv6 because no NAT is ever involved (and port forwarding is part of   
    VS> the destination NAT technology). If you had IPv6 port forwarding (in   
    VS> the IPv4 way) on some device, please surprise me!   
      
   Some consumer routers mislabel IPb6 firewall opening as "port forwarding", mine   
   included.  Mine came with all inblund IPv6 traffic blocked by default (good!),   
   but to open a port to a specific host, I have to go into "IPv6 port forwarding"   
   (sic) and specify the port(s) that I want to open and the interface host ID   
   (last 64 bits of the IPv6 address) to allow traffic for.  Or I can specify that   
   host as an "exposed host", which of course, disables the firewall for that   
   specific IPv6 address.   
      
    VS> It is also difficult to believe that a fancy router does not have a   
    VS> built-in IPv6 firewall (if a firewall is meant by "port opening").   
      
   One would hope it does, and that there's a mechanism to open ports to specific   
   hosts in the firewal config.   
      
    VS> My home MikroTik hAP ac3 does not support NAT or port forwarding in   
    VS> IPv6 (which is expected) but has a nice IPv6 stateful firewall with   
    VS> connection tracking (in fact it's iptables inside). I have eventually   
    VS> moved all my IPv6 tunneling to MikroTik and I'm very happy about it's   
    VS> performance.   
      
   My router does speak of IPv6 port forwarding, but it's actually controlling the   
   firewall's packet filter.     
      
      
   ... Is fire supposed to shoot out of it like that!?   
   === MultiMail/Win v0.52   
   --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux   
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 226/30 227/702 229/424   
   SEEN-BY: 229/426 550 664 1016 240/5832 249/206 317 400 317/3 322/757   
   SEEN-BY: 342/200 633/0 267 280 281 410 412 416 509 640/1384 712/848   
   PATH: 633/410 280 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca