home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   IPV6      The convoluted hot-mess that is IPV6      4,612 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,244 of 4,612   
   Michiel van der Vlist to Deon George   
   New one   
   09 Oct 20 10:56:57   
   
   TID: FMail-W32 2.1.3.7-B20170919   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0200   
   CHRS: CP850 2   
   MSGID: 2:280/5555 5f8025da   
   REPLY: 754.fdn_ipv6@3:633/509 23e4ceb9   
   Hello Deon,   
      
   On Friday October 09 2020 09:42, you wrote to me:   
      
    DG> Yup, any "x" bit number (where X is divisable by 8) is representable   
    DG> as a hex number.   
      
   Nope. There is no such limitation on "x". /Any/ "x" bit number is   
   representable as a hex number. Even more: Any "x" bit number is representable   
   in any base. Binairy, tetral, octal, decimal, duodecimal, hexadecimal or   
   whatever. I can write numbers in base 32 bij using the digits 0-9 and the   
   letters A-V. Or in base 36 bij using 0-9 + A-Z. The size of the base is only   
   limited by the number of glyphs available for the "digits". If I also use the   
   Cyrillic alfabet, I can write in base 69. Not easy to read, but mathematically   
   there is no limitation.   
      
    MV>> If mailers and tossers think at all, which is questionable, they   
    MV>> think in nodenumbers, which are almost always represented to the   
    MV>> human in decimal.   
      
    DG> Yeah, but they lay out packets to be sent using filesnames that are   
    DG> named with a hex value, to represent the destination for the file.   
      
   Some software does that. Your point?   
      
    MV>> f1d0 is "hex speak", directed at the human, not the machine.   
      
    DG> Its cool isnt it that we can make a representable word from hex.   
      
    MV>> Anyway, you are breaking the convention and that can be   
    MV>> confusing. In your case it is clear because there is an "alfa   
    MV>> digit" in one of the hex number groups, but there are plenty of   
    MV>> hex numbers that only have the digits 0-9. How is the reader   
    MV>> going to know if it is hex or decimal?   
      
    DG> Why do they need to know? If I went with SLAAC, it would be even more   
    DG> confusing right?   
      
   SLAAC numbers do not have the "f1d0" marker in the first 16 bits of the host   
   part.   
      
   Look, it is just a game among the members of the Fidonet IPv6 club. If you   
   want to be a spoilsport and play your own game by using hex instead of decimal   
   for the node number part, then ... then you are on your own...   
      
      
   'Nough said...   
      
      
   Cheers, Michiel   
      
   --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303   
    * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 19/10 90/1 120/340 123/131 203/0 221/0 6 226/30 227/702   
   SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 550 664 1016 240/5832 249/206 317 400 250/1 280/464   
   SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5006 5555 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200 460/58 633/0   
   SEEN-BY: 633/267 280 281 410 412 509 640/305 1138 1321 1384 712/848   
   SEEN-BY: 2452/250 3634/12 5019/40 5020/545 1042 12000 5053/58 5075/35   
   PATH: 280/5555 640/1384 633/280 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca