Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    IPV6    |    The convoluted hot-mess that is IPV6    |    4,612 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,244 of 4,612    |
|    Michiel van der Vlist to Deon George    |
|    New one    |
|    09 Oct 20 10:56:57    |
      TID: FMail-W32 2.1.3.7-B20170919       RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes       TZUTC: 0200       CHRS: CP850 2       MSGID: 2:280/5555 5f8025da       REPLY: 754.fdn_ipv6@3:633/509 23e4ceb9       Hello Deon,              On Friday October 09 2020 09:42, you wrote to me:               DG> Yup, any "x" bit number (where X is divisable by 8) is representable        DG> as a hex number.              Nope. There is no such limitation on "x". /Any/ "x" bit number is       representable as a hex number. Even more: Any "x" bit number is representable       in any base. Binairy, tetral, octal, decimal, duodecimal, hexadecimal or       whatever. I can write numbers in base 32 bij using the digits 0-9 and the       letters A-V. Or in base 36 bij using 0-9 + A-Z. The size of the base is only       limited by the number of glyphs available for the "digits". If I also use the       Cyrillic alfabet, I can write in base 69. Not easy to read, but mathematically       there is no limitation.               MV>> If mailers and tossers think at all, which is questionable, they        MV>> think in nodenumbers, which are almost always represented to the        MV>> human in decimal.               DG> Yeah, but they lay out packets to be sent using filesnames that are        DG> named with a hex value, to represent the destination for the file.              Some software does that. Your point?               MV>> f1d0 is "hex speak", directed at the human, not the machine.               DG> Its cool isnt it that we can make a representable word from hex.               MV>> Anyway, you are breaking the convention and that can be        MV>> confusing. In your case it is clear because there is an "alfa        MV>> digit" in one of the hex number groups, but there are plenty of        MV>> hex numbers that only have the digits 0-9. How is the reader        MV>> going to know if it is hex or decimal?               DG> Why do they need to know? If I went with SLAAC, it would be even more        DG> confusing right?              SLAAC numbers do not have the "f1d0" marker in the first 16 bits of the host       part.              Look, it is just a game among the members of the Fidonet IPv6 club. If you       want to be a spoilsport and play your own game by using hex instead of decimal       for the node number part, then ... then you are on your own...                     'Nough said...                     Cheers, Michiel              --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303        * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 19/10 90/1 120/340 123/131 203/0 221/0 6 226/30 227/702       SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 550 664 1016 240/5832 249/206 317 400 250/1 280/464       SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5006 5555 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200 460/58 633/0       SEEN-BY: 633/267 280 281 410 412 509 640/305 1138 1321 1384 712/848       SEEN-BY: 2452/250 3634/12 5019/40 5020/545 1042 12000 5053/58 5075/35       PATH: 280/5555 640/1384 633/280 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca