REPLY: 2:5020/545 5db88a7a   
   MSGID: 2:310/31 5db89129   
   CHRS: LATIN-1 2   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08   
   Hi Alexey!   
      
   29 Oct 2019 21:48, from Alexey Vissarionov -> Richard Menedetter:   
      
    AV>>> We don't have DS-Lite. Or at least I've never seen it here.   
    AV>>> Most connections are IPoe, either IPv4-only or dual-stack.   
    RM>> Interesting! Normally you have a nid level of crappyness between   
    RM>> only CGNAT and full dualstack with 2 public IP addresses. DS-Lite   
    RM>> is a good alternative to offer CGNAT on IPv4 but offer a full   
    RM>> IPv6 public subnet(s).   
    AV> FS... that's dual stack (why lite?), regardless of whether IPv4 is   
    AV> CGNATed.   
      
   Because usually DS is NOT regardless weather you have a public v4 or not.   
   (DS usually means public v4/public v6; DS-Lite if you only have a public v6   
   address)   
      
   DS-Lite is specified here:   
   https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6333   
   Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4 Exhaustion   
      
   CU, Ricsi   
      
   ... I DO have a firm grip on reality! Now I can choke the life out of it!   
   --- GoldED+/LNX   
    * Origin: Congestion on roads is called intimacy in night clubs. (2:310/31)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/2 154/10 203/0 221/0 229/354 426 1014 240/5832 249/206   
   SEEN-BY: 249/317 400 280/464 5003 5006 5555 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757   
   SEEN-BY: 342/200 423/120 633/280 712/848 770/1 2452/250 5020/545   
   PATH: 310/31 280/464 229/426