home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   IPV6      The convoluted hot-mess that is IPV6      4,612 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,966 of 4,612   
   Fernando Toledo to Richard Menedetter   
   Re: switching from he.net to 6to4 questi   
   09 Jul 19 20:25:16   
   
   TZUTC: -0300   
   MSGID: 4436.fidonetipv6@4:902/26 218a69b0   
   REPLY: 2:310/31 5d1de0a3   
   PID: Synchronet 3.17c-Linux  Jul  8 2019 GCC 4.9.2   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.07-Linux r3.117 Jul  8 2019 GCC 4.9.2   
   El 4/7/19 a las 08:15, Richard Menedetter escribió:   
   > Hi Fernando!   
   >    
   > 21 Jun 2019 22:58, from Fernando Toledo -> Fidonet.IPV6:   
   >    
   >  FT> i thinking on switch the actual he.net tunnel to 6to4   
   >    
   > Very bad idea.   
   > 6to4 is very unreliable!   
      
   ok!   
      
   >    
   > The 6to4 endpoints are found by BGP routing, and they are very badly    
   > maintained.   
   >    
   >  FT> 1) is possible to use this 6to4 and route my lan? if true, wich prefix   
   >  FT>  value must be add into radvd?   
   >    
   > Yes ... it should be possible to use the IPv4 derived prefix.   
   >    
   >  FT> 2) i see that the interface setup i need to mandatory add the local   
   >  FT> public ipv4 address   
   >    
   >  FT> iface 6to4 inet6 6to4   
   >  FT>      local 190.19.234.64   
   >    
   >  FT> then ifup 6to4 and works fine.   
   >    
   >  FT> my ipv4 address are dynamic,   
   >    
   > Then I highly discourage you to use 6to4.   
   > (Even with a static IPv4! but much more with a dynamic v4)   
   >    
   >  FT> so i think that must be create the 6to4   
   >  FT> interface manually (scripts that detect the ipv4 and use it) instead   
   >  FT> of /etc/network/interfaces (debian if/up/down). Can you provide some   
   >  FT> example?   
   >    
   > Change to a tunnel server that is geographically closer to you.   
   >    
   > Just ping a bunch of them, and add a new tunnel to the server with the   
   lowest    
   > latency!   
   >   
      
   ok. i will test wich change the tunnel server.   
   thanks for your reply!   
      
      
      
   > CU, Ricsi   
   >    
   > ... He sets low standards and then consistently fails to achieve them.   
   > --- GoldED+/LNX   
   >  * Origin: I don't have a solution but I admire the problem! (2:310/31)   
   >   
   --- SBBSecho 3.07-Linux   
    * Origin: Dock Sud BBS - http://bbs.docksud.com.ar (4:902/26)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/19 123 14/5 15/0 2 16/0 19/36 34/999 90/1 116/18 120/331   
   SEEN-BY: 123/130 131 128/2 153/7715 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/0 1 360   
   SEEN-BY: 226/17 229/354 426 1014 230/0 150 152 240/1120 5832 249/206   
   SEEN-BY: 249/317 400 250/1 261/38 100 267/155 275/100 280/464 5003   
   SEEN-BY: 280/5006 5555 282/1031 1056 291/1 111 292/854 310/31 317/3   
   SEEN-BY: 320/119 219 322/0 757 340/400 342/13 200 423/120 633/280   
   SEEN-BY: 640/1384 712/848 770/1 801/189 2320/105 2452/250 3634/12   
   SEEN-BY: 3828/7 5020/545   
   PATH: 902/26 27 90/1 261/38 320/219 221/1 280/464 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca