TZUTC: 1000   
   MSGID: 1119.fido-ipv6@3:633/410 21051f82   
   REPLY: 2:280/5555 5c9f4dd1   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.03-Linux r3.65 Dec 31 2017 GCC 4.6.3   
   -=> On 03-30-19 12:00, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Tony Langdon <=-   
      
    MvV> Hello Tony,   
      
    MvV> On Friday March 29 2019 09:09, you wrote to me:   
      
    MvV>> Tunnels are good. Native is better.   
      
    TL> Native with your own reverse DNS is even better. :)   
      
    MvV> There is always something beter. But I consider configurable rev DNS a   
    MvV> bit of a vanity thing, It is my understanding that some things will not   
    MvV> work propely without rev DNS, and that having all IPv6 addresses   
    MvV> resolve to the same symbolic host name is a kludge that may cause other   
    MvV> problems. So I am glad that my ISP now has unique rev DNS for all their   
    MvV> entire IPv6 prefix range.   
      
   Might be the most practical for dynamic or privacy IPs, given the huge address   
   space.  I unly have reverse DNS for my configured static IPx.   
      
    MvV> Configurable rev DNA is too low on my wish list to change poviders.   
      
   Yeah, it's not really a biggie.   
      
      
   ... If the polls are so accurate, why are there so many polling companies?   
   === MultiMail/Win v0.51   
   --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux   
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)   
   SEEN-BY: 15/2 123/1970 226/17 229/107 354 426 1014 240/5832 249/206   
   SEEN-BY: 249/317 400 280/464 317/3 322/757 342/200 393/68 633/0 267   
   SEEN-BY: 633/280 281 410 412 509 640/1384 712/848 3828/7   
   PATH: 633/410 280 229/426