TID: FMail-W32 2.1.3.7-B20170919   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   CHRS: CP850 2   
   MSGID: 2:280/5555 5c9cc5ed   
   REPLY: 1099.fido-ipv6@3:633/410 210132a3   
   Hello Tony,   
      
   On Thursday March 28 2019 08:08, you wrote to me:   
      
    MvV>> IIRC Tony Langdon is using 4in6 tunnels. When IPv6 becomes the   
    MvV>> dominanty protocl - and we may live to see that - using a 4in6   
    MvV>> tunnel may be better than the other way around.   
      
    TL> No, though I do use a VPN to route a /29 of IPv4 to my BBSs.  The VPN   
    TL> is running OpenVPN, and is carried on IPv4, not V6, so you're not   
    TL> quite correct,   
      
   Ok, so my memory once again failed me. ;-)   
      
    TL> though I _could_ theoretically use 4in6.   
      
   When IPv6 becomes the dominant protocol 4in6 tunnels may become popular for   
   those still needing incoming IPv4. Until "everyone has IPv6 of course. Then we   
   can switch off IPv4. ;-)   
      
    TL> I'm probably a little unusual in that I'm running a VPN tunnel to   
    TL> carry IPv4, while all IPv6 here is native.   
      
   Very unusual. Few hobbyists have more than one IPv4 address these days. Having   
   moe than one is unusual by itself. Having them via a VPN is even more unusual.   
   You may be the only one in Fidonet.   
      
      
   Cheers, Michiel   
      
   --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303   
    * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)   
   SEEN-BY: 15/2 19/10 123/1970 154/10 203/0 221/0 6 226/17 229/107 354   
   SEEN-BY: 229/426 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 5006 5555   
   SEEN-BY: 292/624 854 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200 393/68 423/120 460/58   
   SEEN-BY: 633/280 640/1384 712/848 770/1 2452/250 3828/7 5019/40 5020/545   
   SEEN-BY: 5020/1042 12000 5053/58   
   PATH: 280/5555 464 229/426