Good ${greeting_time}, Victor!   
      
   27 Jan 2019 21:12:10, you wrote to Markus Reschke:   
      
    VS>>> Good point. Thank you. Maybe fc00::/7 has a chance of becoming   
    VS>>> the new 192.168/16.   
    MR>> I'd recommend to use fd00::/8 since fc00::/8 was meant to be some   
    MR>> kind of globally unique local address space managed by a registry   
    MR>> (-> B2B VPNs).   
    VS> fc00::/7 is from RFC4193, and where is fd00::/8 defined?   
      
   Guess!   
      
      
   --   
   Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin   
   gremlin.ru!gremlin; +vii-cmiii-ccxxix-lxxix-xlii   
      
   ... GPG: 8832FE9FA791F7968AC96E4E909DAC45EF3B1FA8 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net   
   --- /bin/vi   
    * Origin: http://openwall.com/Owl (2:5020/545)