Hi Victor!   
      
   Jan 27 15:08 2019, Victor Sudakov wrote to Markus Reschke:   
      
    VS> Good point. Thank you. Maybe fc00::/7 has a chance of becoming the    
    VS> new 192.168/16.   
      
   I'd recommend to use fd00::/8 since fc00::/8 was meant to be some kind of   
   globally unique local address space managed by a registry (-> B2B VPNs).       
      
    VS> I don't think enterprise-class firewalls have UPnP, do they?   
      
   Most don't. But you never know what e-junk some company uses. >:)   
      
    VS> And thinking about SOHO and home routers/firewalls, what kind of IPv6    
    VS> connectivity are they going to have, what do you think? Those present    
    VS> who have native IPv6 connectivity, what's your ISP's policy on    
    VS> assigning addresses to customers?   
      
   /64 as xfer network and a /56 for the LAN (both dynamic, forced change every 6   
   months).   
      
    VS> Interesting. Do you know of any implementations that could translate    
    VS> ULA addresses into one global /64 pool?   
      
   Cisco, Juniper, Linux, ...    
   However, you need to check the details for each box and firmware. For example,   
   Linux can hide the complete LAN behind a single IPv6 address.      
      
   ciao,   
   Markus   
      
   ---    
    * Origin: *** theca tabellaria *** (2:240/1661)