Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    IPV6    |    The convoluted hot-mess that is IPV6    |    4,612 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,524 of 4,612    |
|    Michiel van der Vlist to Markus Reschke    |
|    NANOG 73    |
|    05 Aug 18 16:10:35    |
      Hello Markus,              On Thursday August 02 2018 15:22, you wrote to me:               MR> Back to IPv6. Rolling out IPv6 would require an investment (man power,        MR> software, hardware), something the big telcos want to avoid.              Not just the big ones I'd say. And it is not limited to IPv6. Not a new thing       either. What we see is that the managers - the ons who decide how the money is       spend - don't stay in the seat for the rest of their lives. They move on after       a couple of years. As a consequence they are not interested in what happens       over five years. They want e return on investment before the end of next       year...               MR> Their customer service sucks already and a sudden increase of service        MR> calls by customers about an IPv6 migration would become a nightmare.        MR> As long as it works and makes money there's no reason to spend money        MR> for IPv6.              Indeed. The fact that the longer they wait, the more expensive it will get,       does not bother those that make the decisions. Apres nous le deluge...               MR> And this not just true for the large US telcos but also for tons of        MR> other companies.              With a few exceptions. Such as T-Mobile US... :-)                     Cheers, Michiel              --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303        * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca