Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    IPV6    |    The convoluted hot-mess that is IPV6    |    4,612 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,522 of 4,612    |
|    Markus Reschke to Michiel van der Vlist    |
|    NANOG 73    |
|    02 Aug 18 15:22:04    |
      Hi Michiel!              Aug 02 14:09 2018, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Markus Reschke:               MvdV> Here are some interesting thoughts about why T-Mobile US went IPv6         MvdV> and others did not (yet).               MvdV> https://preview.tinyurl.com/y7hjyjlf              In case of the large US telcos my take on this is that they are after profit       optimization and are trying to invest as less money as possible. Since those       telcos have monopolies in most US regions they don't upgrade their networks to       make customers happy and provide faster internet access. They will invest only       when forced by a competitor. A few days ago New York state voted to throw       Charter out of the state for not delivering and lying after their merger with       Time Warner. AFAIK this is one of the very rare cases of an US state taking       action against a big telco. Back to IPv6. Rolling out IPv6 would require an       investment (man power, software, hardware), something the big telcos want to       avoid. Their customer service sucks already and a sudden increase of service       calls by customers about an IPv6 migration would become a nightmare. As long       as it works and makes money there's no reason to spend money for IPv6. And       this not just true for the large US telcos but also for tons of other       companies.              ciao,       Markus              ---         * Origin: *** theca tabellaria *** (2:240/1661)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca