Hello Bj”rn,   
      
   On Monday July 30 2018 02:04, you wrote to me:   
      
    MvdV>> switching off IPv4 and accomodating "legacy" with transition   
    MvdV>> mechanisms.   
      
    BF>    Smart. That way it's easier for them to prevent their customers   
    BF> from accessing media out of their control. At least for quite some   
    BF> years ahead -- the US ISPs seem to be even slower to go IPv6 than the   
    BF> European ones. :(   
      
   I am not sure that criticism is justified. On both accounts.   
      
   These statistics: http://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/28/   
      
   .   .. do not support your claim that the ISPs in the US are slower with IPv6   
   than those in Europe. On the contrary I'd say. Here the big ones are still   
   dragging their feet while the big ones across the pond, especially the mobiles   
   are well on their way.   
      
   Also all the big content providers are reacheable via IPv6. So how does one   
   control the customers - that all have IPv6 - by doing "tricks" with their IPv4   
   access?   
      
   Dropping IPv4 and going IPv6 only makes sense. That it involves some "tricks"   
   to accomodate "legacy", tricks that may have some negative side effects,   
   should be an incentive for the conservatives to get moving.   
      
      
   Cheers, Michiel   
      
   --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303   
    * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)