home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   IPV6      The convoluted hot-mess that is IPV6      4,612 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,448 of 4,612   
   Victor Sudakov to Benny Pedersen   
   2:5057/53   
   05 Jul 18 21:59:54   
   
   Dear Benny,   
      
   05 Jul 18 06:46, you wrote to me:   
      
    MvdV>>>> Let's give him and his NC a chance to correct it...   
      
    BP>>> it basicly there own problem, but binkp.net should reject ina   
    BP>>> with binkp.net listnings   
      
    VS>> Last time I checked, binkp.net did not rely solely on DDN, you   
    VS>> could enter any RR for your node manually via a Web page (which I   
    VS>> did long ago). So if you have created a RR for your node in   
    VS>> binkp.net, there should be no technical problem using a   
    VS>> binkp.net-derived name in the nodelist flags.   
      
    BP> i did not know its a webpage aswell, if the web lets users create rr   
    BP> that are not in nodelist, hmm :)   
      
   Yes, it does. It started this way. It is very convenient, and works as a   
   regular DNS zone with a Web editor.   
      
   Of course, if you try to register at https://binkp.net/ as 2:5005/49, a   
   Netmail with a confirmation code will be sent to 2:5005/49. So it's pretty   
   safe, you can create any RR only for your own node.   
      
    VS>> The requirement in FTS-5004   
      
    VS>> If the INA flag (or any of the protocol flags) of any node   
    VS>> carries host name built from the FTN address using DDN or any   
    VS>> other method, that node MUST be skipped and MUST NOT appear in   
    VS>> resulting NS zone. In general, such names SHOULD NOT appear in   
    VS>> the nodelist.   
      
    BP> +1   
      
    VS>> has always seemed technically unfounded (or at least the   
    VS>> unarticulated "any other method" statement) to me. Does it mean   
    VS>> that I can use the INA:fido.sibptus.ru flag all right, but cannot   
    VS>> use the INA:node49.net5005.sibptus.ru flag? Why?   
      
    BP> it does not work since binkd only handle single root-domain in   
    BP> binkd.cfg   
      
    BP> try in cfg:   
      
   I'm not going to put "root-domain sibptus.ru" in binkd's config, that's a   
   silly idea. I mean that a sysop has the right to put any DNS name she finds   
   necessary into the INA flag, no matter if it's derived from the FTN address or   
   not. A nodelist has no concept of "root-domain", a DNS name is just a DNS name.   
      
   Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN   
   --- GoldED+/BSD 1.1.5-b20160322-b20160322   
    * Origin: Ulthar (2:5005/49)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca