Dear Benny,   
      
   04 Jul 18 19:52, you wrote to Michiel van der Vlist:   
      
    MvdV>> Let's give him and his NC a chance to correct it...   
      
    BP> it basicly there own problem, but binkp.net should reject ina with   
    BP> binkp.net listnings   
      
   Last time I checked, binkp.net did not rely solely on DDN, you could enter any   
   RR for your node manually via a Web page (which I did long ago). So if you   
   have created a RR for your node in binkp.net, there should be no technical   
   problem using a binkp.net-derived name in the nodelist flags.   
      
   The requirement in FTS-5004   
      
   If the INA flag (or any of the protocol flags) of any node carries   
   host name built from the FTN address using DDN or any other method,   
   that node MUST be skipped and MUST NOT appear in resulting NS zone.   
   In general, such names SHOULD NOT appear in the nodelist.   
      
   has always seemed technically unfounded (or at least the unarticulated "any   
   other method" statement) to me. Does it mean that I can use the    
   NA:fido.sibptus.ru flag all right, but cannot use the INA:node49   
   net5005.sibptus.ru flag? Why?   
      
   Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN   
   --- GoldED+/BSD 1.1.5-b20160322-b20160322   
    * Origin: Ulthar (2:5005/49)