Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    IPV6    |    The convoluted hot-mess that is IPV6    |    4,612 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,273 of 4,612    |
|    Michiel van der Vlist to Bj”rn Felten    |
|    Tunnel vs. native IPv6    |
|    13 Apr 18 14:55:37    |
      Hello Bj”rn,              On Friday April 13 2018 01:32, you wrote to All:                      BF> Now with fibre where I get better than 100/100M I can clearly see that        BF> a tunnel is much slower than native IPv6.              I already reported some years ago that when I had a 30 MBps IPv4 connection I       only got 1/3 to 1/2 of the speed via the SixXs en he.net tunnels.              My ISP says I now have a 40/4 connection.               BF> On http://www.bredbandskollen.se/ I can measure the speed I get,        BF> and via my IPv6 tunnel I get less than 20% of the speed I get on IPv4.              35.91/4.17 Mbps on IPv4              The IPv6 test does not work. There is an "Avancerad m„tning" windowm but it       freezes. I am unable to select a server an continue...                     When I use this one: http://ipv6-test.com/speedtest/              I get 29.8 on IPv4 and 29.5 on IPv6 (Netherlands, Zeelandmet)              7.74 IPv4, 26,6 IPv6 (France, Roubaix)              18.9 IPv4m 17.5 IPv6 ( France, Paris)              19.9 IPv4, 20.8 IPv6 (UK, Porthmouth)               BF> So, I'm eagerly awaiting my native IPv6.              I am sure you arem but given the response so far, I fear you will have to       switch providers ones again if you want it before St. Nobody. :-(                            Cheers, Michiel              --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303        * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca