-=> Bj”rn Felten wrote to All <=-   
      
    BF> Now with fibre where I get better than 100/100M I can clearly see that   
    BF> a tunnel is much slower than native IPv6.   
      
    BF>    On http://www.bredbandskollen.se/ I can measure the speed I get, and   
    BF> via my IPv6 tunnel I get less than 20% of the speed I get on IPv4.   
      
   Ouch! :(  I can't reproduce these results here, as I run native IPv6.     
      
    BF>    So, I'm eagerly awaiting my native IPv6.   
      
   I bet! :D   
      
    BF>    It would also be interesting to know if the above test site works   
    BF> for sites from outside of Sweden. To get the IPv6 test choose   
    BF> "Avancerad m„tning" in the right hand menu and there select one of the   
    BF> IPv6 endpoints.   
      
   Can take a look, though from this side of the world, there's a lot of variables   
   in the way.  Well, it does work,  at least on the default site. but as   
   expected, the results were poor - around 3.5Mbps each way, compared to   
   78.14/31.25, using a local speedtest.net server.   
      
      
   ... A product with 'ZERO DEFECTS' doesn't ship!   
   === MultiMail/Win32 v0.49   
   --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux   
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)