Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    IPV6    |    The convoluted hot-mess that is IPV6    |    4,612 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,143 of 4,612    |
|    Michiel van der Vlist to Tony Langdon    |
|    finaly for me    |
|    19 Mar 18 13:01:14    |
      Hello Tony,              On Monday March 19 2018 10:53, you wrote to me:               MvV>> On average of course, but my impressiosn is that there are a lot of        MvV>> nodes that just run on inertia rather than active sysop involvement.        MvV>> You will find less of those among the members of the IPv6 club.               TL> Yes, you need to take active steps in a lot of cases,              For starters: 30% of the nodes in my list of IPv6 capable nodes still connect       via a tunnel. Setting uo a tunnel certainly requires taking active steps.               TL> IPv6 may not be automatically enabled in some Fido software (that        TL> supports it). Network wise, it depends on your ISP. Mine enables IPv6        TL> by default and all of the routers they provide support IPv6 out of the        TL> box, so at the network level it should "just work".              Your ISp is a pioneer. Many ISPs around the world are still dragging their       feet. So " just work" is still the exception rather than te rule.               TL> Wasn't the case for me, but that's because I added IPv6 before it went        TL> into production. It was still a trial service (back in early 2011),        TL> and I had to turn it on to enable the trial, once I had a router that        TL> was IPv6 capable. That trial service did eventually become the        TL> production service I'm on today.              I have native Dual Stack now for over a year, but my ISP is also one of the       slow ones. Plus that now their policy is to go DS -Light. New customers get       DS-Light. On request they can be converted ti IPv4 only. That is another       spoke in the whell of "just work".               MvV>> Same here. Plus that when adding new links and having to make a        MvV>> choice, I prefer to link to the IPv6 capable node over linking        MvV>> to the IPv4 only node.               TL> Me too, I think around 50% of my upstream links have IPv6 here.              Same here, around 50%. In future, I may even drop some IPv4 only links to up       the percentage. ;-)                     Cheers, Michiel              --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303        * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca