Hello Kees,   
      
   On Saturday October 03 2015 19:21, you wrote to me:   
      
    MvdV>> With IPv6 there never was such an excuse anyway. There is no   
    MvdV>> shortage of addresses and there will not be for the foreseeable   
    MvdV>> future. Why not give everyone a static prefix?   
      
    KE>  It requires additional administration.   
      
   So let then do some work for the "administratiekosten" that they charge...   
      
   OTOH, I could live with a theoretically dynamic address that in practise never   
   changes like my present IPv4 address.   
      
    MvdV>> AFAIK, the Dutch IPSs that offer native IPv6 all issue static   
    MvdV>> prefixes.   
      
    KE>  They do?. I have a static IPv6 from Xs4all, but so is my IPv4.   
      
   AFAIK the dsl providers all issue static addresses end the cable guys are just   
   starting and haven't shown their true colours yet.   
      
    KE>  I have not looked at what Ziggo does. I am not to keen, to find out,   
    KE> as at that moment I also have adual homed IPv6 host.   
      
   Rumour has it that existing customers will be issued native IPv6 starting   
   beginning next year. They won't tell us more than that...   
      
      
   Cheers, Michiel   
      
   --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20130111   
    * Origin: 2001:470:1f15:1117::1 (2:280/5555)