Re: Re: Wikipedia   
     By: Boraxman to Ajk on Fri Jan 20 2012 07:24 pm   
      
    >   Re: Re: Wikipedia   
    >   By: Ajk to Boraxman on Thu Jan 19 2012 08:01 pm   
    >    
    >  > Hi,   
    >  >   
    >  > > It's not a political view.  When you are fighting for your right to exi   
    >  > > is no longer a political issue.   
    >  > >   
    >  > > Wikipedia feels the that this bill is a direct threat to their existanc   
    >  > > fighting this threat, they are not taking a political position, but one   
    >  > > self defence.   
    >  >   
    >  > I really don't see the problem - we live in a global economy and if the   
    >  > US government are stupid enough to limit the activities of Wikipedia to   
    >  > function then they can just leave the country. No problem. Many other   
    >  > countries (including the UK) would welcome this organisation with open   
    >  > arms. I am very disaponinted that Wikipedia have become so involved in   
    >  > US domestic politics.   
    >  >   
    >  > --   
    >  > Cheers,   
    >  > Alex Kemp (ajk) telnet://norbertbbs.org   
    >  >   
    >    
    > Wikipedia have little choice.  They have to get involved.  You can't stay   
    > neutral in a manner like that.   
    >    
   Neither do blogs either.   
      
   $ The Millionaire $   
   Park Avenue Place   
   Surrey, B.C., Canada Û  Û   
      
      
   ---   
    þ Synchronet þ Park Avenue Place - parkave.synchro.net   
    * Origin: Time Warp of the Future BBS - Home of League 10 (1:340/400)