On 5/17/2009 8:26 AM, Roalt wrote:   
   >> This may be obvious, or not, but you didn't indicate, have you tried a   
   >> different cable, or port on the hub/router?  If you have cats or dogs, some   
   >> seem to think cat5 is "yummy" ...   
   >    
   > I've tried both.. in fact, the cable I'm using now is brand    
   > new-right-out-of-package.... I'll deal for the time being.. Will see if I   
   can    
   > get another computer...   
      
   Another thing to ask, is where the throughput is coming from... remote test    
   site, or LAN file copies...  if it's LAN, are you sure it's using the local IP    
   instead of a round trip from the net/wan?   
      
   --    
   Michael J. Ryan - tracker1(at)theroughnecks(dot)net - www.theroughnecks.net   
   icq: 4935386  -  AIM/AOL: azTracker1  -  Y!: azTracker1  -  MSN/Win: (email)   
      
   ... B5: The bitch of it is that you probably did the right thing. But you did    
   it in the wrong way. In the inconvenient way. Now you have to pay the penalty    
   for that. I know it stinks, but that's the way it is.   
      
   ---   
    þ Synchronet þ theroughnecks.net - you know you want it   
    * Origin: Time Warp of the Future BBS - Home of League 10 (1:340/400)