Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    INTERNET    |    The global pornography network    |    2,155 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 275 of 2,155    |
|    Ash-Fox to DOVE-Net.Internet    |
|    #OpenBSD    |
|    06 Oct 08 11:53:25    |
      This is a smallish rant/story about one of my experiences in the OpenBSD IRC       community. But before I do so, I will give a introduction about the state       of affairs, myself etc.              I have spent many years on IRC. I remember the first time I logged on IRC, I       was absolutely fascinated by how many different channels existed and how       there was litterally a channel for every topic.              I very quickly became accustomed to support channels, helping out users in       real time that had problems. Over the years, certain places became more       friendly, others became intolerant and some just stayed the same.              There are quite a few channels I help out in, but remain silent most of the       time in some channels due to the way the community works. One of these       channels is #OpenBSD.              #OpenBSD is a support channel for the now becoming obscure OpenBSD operating       system. It is not a very friendly channel most of the time. Users who       enter, asking about hardware support are often to go read some manual (at       least provide a link?) or are told to donate their hardware to OpenBSD       developers or stop complaining - They were not complaining, only asking for       support.              It should seem quite obvious as to why I would often help people in private       (one to one) communications when I see them asking for help in that       channel. It just isn't a very friendly place when it comes to helping users       even though it is a support channel.              Note that OpenBSD has a 'legacy' of being a very secure operating system and       it's community being very security minded. Many of the users of the       operating system acknowledge the fact that other operating       systems/distributions do not take security to heart and end up with what       can be considered terrifying vulnerabilities.              Over the years other operating systems that exceed OpenBSD in usage have       been growing larger and larger, making OpenBSD less relevent. Linux       distributions in particular have been a particular thorn in OpenBSD's side       (I doubt that the OpenBSD community will admit it though - claiming it       doesn't rival them in security, free to use for anything).              Much of the pro-OpenBSD user have diminished from what it used to be. Since       then, the majority of pro-OpenBSD users in #OpenBSD (in my opinion) have a       grudge against Linux.               This is where the story begins.              I made a fatal mistake about a week ago. I helped someone in #OpenBSD, in       the channel it self. They wanted to know the administrative differences       between OpenBSD and a Enterprise Linux system. He did not know much about       OpenBSD. Being that I had experience with both and a good amount of       knowledge. I started typing up a lot of information between each other.              I discussed why certain daemons in OpenBSD were more secure, because       of 'fake/change root' capability in OpenBSD was superior in certain       technical ways which prevented certain circumvention which allowed one to       get out of a 'fake/change root' situation on Linux. Since in most       enterprise Linux systems and OpenBSD, the majority of daemons sit in a       fake/change root setup, this was relevent information.              I brought up a lot of comparisons, trying to remain completely unbiased       towards one or the other. Eventually, I brought up how the root account was       not disabled from being logged into by default.              Disabling the root account would prevent certain security vulnerabilities       that would allow people to bruteforce into a server because they know a       account they can log into.              It would prevent certain vulnerabilities in daemons to break into that       account and how the Linux system we were comparing to had not only the root       account disabled, but had a nicely secure 'sudo' configuration setup by       default (I also mentioned how selinux, apparmor were often configured to       disable code execution under the root account through buffer overflows etc.       too).              This caused a huge outcry on the channel, three different users, who didn't       even talk for days on the channel suddenly came to life and started on how       that isn't really security and hiding the door is no substitute for a good       lock.              At this point, I was actually surprised. I felt the arrogance of #OpenBSD       suddenly came to the point that they hated Linux so much, that if Linux did       something even slightly better in security, it was obviously not true and       Linux was 100% wrong.              I argued with these three users that hiding the "door" does not make the       system any less secure and I acknowledged that security by obscurity       obviously won't replace good hard security, but claiming that I       am /replacing/ the current good security with obscurity was a outright lie.              It went into a argument about how if someone uses a weak password, it won't       help any if the user is named root or "ash-fox", at which point I pointed       out the obvious. The hacker finds the box, knows there is a root account       and breaks into that. I then stated that a hacker finds a box, knows the       root account is disabled but does not know what the user account is which       can access root - he's going to need to find that account name first. How       is the latter less secure?              As it went on, these users arguing against me did not acknowledge that I was       right in any way or form, they just continuously changed the argument. At       one point one person stated that I made administration a lot harder. Upon       which I just grinned at my monitor and asked why typing a command       like "sudo -i" (gives you a root shell from your user account) or "sudo       cp /blah /wee" was so much harder.              Another argument, automated scripts that needed to execute commands on a       remote machine through ssh command combos would be harder... This coming       from people who are supposed to be security oriented. I pointed out again,       adding 'sudo' to a command is not hard, additionally, you can limit the       commands sudo can execute on a per account basis so wouldn't it be infact       more secure?              It continued, claiming that it was making administration too difficult in       the calls for security and went on about how usernames should be 128       character long randomly generated, and passwords should be 512 long       randomly generated passwords when you initially install the system, trying       to downplay the whole default 'sudo' setup, disabled root account setup       that a Linux system provides.              At which point, I pointed out that they were blowing things out of       proportion and if they were really concerned about user friendliness, they       would start fixing the install process of OpenBSD.              One example I gave was when you're thrown into a command line interface       partition manager and have to figure out how to use it yourself - However,       when you type the help command, you only see the last lines of the help       file, which really tell you nothing about how to setup the partitions. You       have no way to scroll up or down either.              Someone pointed out that people should read the manual then (you get this       feeling of 'RTFM' from people like that).              Eventually, the argument was ended with someone stating that they are simply       making their operating system available to me and I don't have to use it if       I don't like it.              I cannot refute that - but, I am close to saying I'm finished with helping       out in #OpenBSD.              That said, during the entire discussion, there was one or two people (I       cannot recall if it was the same person) spectating who did acknowledge       some of the points I made - so it isn't the entirety of the #OpenBSD       channel behaving this way, but these people also never talk on the channel       and I suspect they don't because they are like me.              I did not really get to finish helping that guy out with finding the       differences between OpenBSD and the Enterprise Linux we were discussing.              --        Do not meddle in the affairs of kitsune, for you are crunchy and good with       ketchup.              ---        þ Synchronet þ QuickFox BBS - "Right on, Commander!" - telnet:/       bbs.quickfox.net        * Origin: Time Warp of the Future BBS - Home of League 10 (1:340/400)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca