TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0200   
   CHRS: UTF-8 2   
   PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221   
   MSGID: 2:280/464 5e90c1a5   
   REPLY: 2:221/1.58@fidonet e349d8a7   
   Hi August,   
      
   On 2020-04-10 13:18:00, you wrote to me:   
      
    AA> It does boast "private" sessions.. but that is not the same as   
    AA> encrypted or truly private.   
      
   Someone said you should regard the "private" video conferences you have: as a   
   loud conversation in a public place. If you don't mind that, you could use   
   Zoom.   
      
    AA> Zoom seems to cater to the "if it's free, it can't hurt (I have   
    AA> nothing to hide), and it's fun!" mentality (aka, the mezmerized   
    AA> uneducated minions).   
      
   Maybe the stupid should be protected against the devious?   
      
    AA> OTOH, https://jitsi.org/  promises privacy.  It might the better   
    AA> choice if anyone cares about privacy.   
      
   Jitsi was sort of recommended by a Dutch privacy organisation, as being the   
   least bad choice privacy wise. Given the small amount of time they could spend   
   on investigating the alternatives for Zoom.   
      
   Bye, Wilfred.   
      
   --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 103/705 154/10 203/0 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/101   
   SEEN-BY: 229/426 452 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 288/100   
   SEEN-BY: 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848   
   SEEN-BY: 770/1 2452/250   
   PATH: 280/464 229/426