>   Re: Rise of the Dark Nets   
    >   By: S/370 to Poindexter Fortran on Thu Aug 22 2013 06:05 am   
    >    
    > S/> That's a good point. I read an article recently about an IT specialist   
    > S/> who got convicted of possessing child pornography. Although his hard   
    > S/> drives were encrypted, the judge ordered him to turn over the passwords   
    > S/> to decrypt them. Self incrimination? The judge says its not because he   
    > S/> is already assumed to be guilty! So much for innocent until proven   
    > S/> guilty.   
    >    
    > The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and   
    > effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,   
    > and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or   
    > affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the   
    > persons or things to be seized.   
    >    
    > ---   
    >  þ Synchronet þ realitycheckBBS -- http://realitycheckBBS.org   
      
   All of which means nothing if your upstream is willing to turn over any and   
   all logs of traffic originating from you.   
      
   At which point, you're in their house, and they are free to disclose anything   
   the like about you.  You, have no say in the matter.   
      
   ---   
    þ Synchronet þ Sent from KC2UGV-1   
    * Origin: Time Warp of the Future BBS - Home of League 10 (1:340/400)