Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    HOTDOGED    |    Support for the HotDogEd software    |    1,000 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 112 of 1,000    |
|    mark lewis to Ulrich Schroeter    |
|    No Echolist with hotdogED?    |
|    22 Oct 13 20:59:44    |
      On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Ulrich Schroeter wrote to Simon Bach:               US> CDP proposal        US> FSP-1016.003 Automatic configuration of Points in Fidonet        US> has answered this question regarding echo forwarding lists .... in        US> section        US> 3.1.2.1.2 ECHOZZZZ.ZIP        US> and        US> 3.2.2 Transmitting the application date       -> Freq ECHOLIST               US> The only thing to consider ... nodes supporting HotDogED clients        US> should add the freq magic ECHOLIST in their system and ECHOZZZZ.ZIP        US> to be sent. So on the supporting system the echo uplink lists have        US> to be compiled and named ECHOZZZZ.LST and zip'd thereafter ... =;)              is there anything wrong with sending the existing, published and distributed       Echolist? is the above perhaps talking about something else other than the       Echolist? something, perhaps, like the list of available areas (%AVAIL) from       the feed's uplinks? where are other, unlisted, area names to be found? how is       one to know of the existance of an area if it is not in the %AVAIL or %LIST       areafix responses?              )\/(ark              --- FMail/Win32 1.60        * Origin: (1:3634/12.71)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca