Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    HOLYSMOKE    |    Religion Debate Echo    |    182 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13 of 182    |
|    Ross Sauer to Ed Hulett    |
|    Is Fred Phelps a Christian?    |
|    10 Oct 10 01:32:44    |
      "Ed Hulett -> Ross Sauer" <1:123/789.0> wrote in       news:10802$HOLYSMOKE@JamNNTPd:               RS>> With Fred Phelps' daughter arguing in front of the Supreme        EH> Court,        EH> (and they        RS>> had to disinfect the chamber after,) something I wonder about.               EH> She's not the worst one to set foot there.               RS>> Is Fred Phelps and his brood actually Christian?               EH> No. It comes down to "what would Jesus do?" He definitely would NOT do        EH> what Phelps and his idiot bunch do.              Phelps' religion is based more on the Old Testament, the wrathful punish       everyone for what a few did wrong-type God.              There are also parts of Paul's teachings in Phelps interpretations.                      RS>> And please none of this "They aren't true Christian" nonsense        EH> either.               EH> It isn't nonsense. No true Christian would be so hateful.              So what do you all him?       Besides what's unprintable?               RS>> Osama Bin Laden is described as a Muslim.               EH> So what? Are you equating Phelps with bin Laden?              In a way, yes.       Both subscribe to nothing but hatred and both are of the type of       preacher that dictates everything, and rules the flock with an iron       fist.               RS>> Meir Kahane was described as a Jew.               EH> Again, so what?               EH> It doesn't matter what they are described as, it is their actions that        EH> define them.              Quite true.       But if Osama Bin Laden is described as a Muslim, by the same logic       Phelps should be described as a Christian.               RS>> Also, should the 1rst Amendment apply to Phelps' stunts?               EH> Yes, it does. What they do is reprehensible, but it is protected by        EH> the 1st Amendment.               RS>> I say it does, since the same people that censor Phelps, can        EH> sensor anyone RS> else for any reason.               EH> Exactly.              Do you think the Supreme Court will rule against Phelps?              --- Xnews/5.04.25        * Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca