A couple of things;   
      
      
   Firstly, the sodomites of America calling for `rights' is really strange,   
   since they already HAVE all the `rights' everyone else have.   
      
      
   But they also want certain speech classified as `hate speech', and that steps   
   over the line.   
      
      
   Where it may not set well with sodomites to be called certain things, society   
   needs to remember that most of those terms have been around since sodomy has   
   existed.   
      
      
   Where sodomites regularly refer to `hetero'sexuals as `straights'...`heteros'.   
   ..and in more recent times `breeders'; they object to being refered to as   
   `homos' (although *I* do not object to being refered to as `hetero'); and more   
   base terms that refer to sodomites which there is no need to list here   
   (everyone is quite familiar with them all, and the last time this discussion   
   took place in this echo, they only enflamed the entire echo).   
      
      
   So, `sodomites' will do nicely, and isn't in any way inflamatory (at least it   
   SHOULDN'T be), as it is an accurate and to-the-point term that conveys the   
   full context of what, exactly, we are talking about.   
      
      
   I know....I know....sodomites like to be refered to as *gay*! But the word   
   *gay* is not an accurate discription of what we're actually talking about at   
   all. The word *gay* was hijacked by the homosexual crowd to refer to   
   themselves, because it is a soft, non-threatening term that does not convey   
   the true meaning of `sodomy'. In fact, the word *gay* doesn't convey `sodomy'   
   at all. What the word *gay*  conveys in its true meaning and intent is a bunch   
   of people sitting or standing around, happily enjoying each other's company,   
   living in the moment, and deriving happiness and joy from their social   
   communion together.   
      
      
   There is nothing *gay* about sodomy. It is an insideous, despicable, desease-   
   causing, and desease-spreading activity, about which nothing *gay* applies.   
      
      
   Sick and disgusting would be far more accurate. Which, of course, is why the   
   sodomites hijacked the word *gay* to refer to it. It conceals all the   
   nastiness and humiliation, the desease and sodomy-unique injuries it entails.   
      
      
   And, when you consider fairly all the aspects of `sodomy', and all it carries   
   with it, its entire meaning and intent, you can't possibly apply the word   
   *gay* to it in all honesty.   
      
      
   Secondly, the meaning and intent of the word *marriage*, has, since the time   
   of Adam and Eve, been the joining of a Man and a Woman in the   
   physical\emotional bond of a lifetime commitment to each other and the family   
   unit they create by physical love\procreation.   
      
      
   The very notion that two sodomites of the same sex are `married' in any sense   
   of the word is a travesty; a bastardation of the entire concept of what a   
   `marriage' stands for, its true intent.   
      
      
   And the very idea that a governing body (state OR federal), or those sitting   
   on legal forums (judges on court benches) administrating law over us, would   
   allow the bastardation of one of the bedrocks of civilization; marriage   
   between a Man and a Woman), by lending credence in any way to the sodomite's   
   campaign to over-ride our society's repulsion toward it, and force it into the   
   mainstream as `normal', fly's in the face of our entire nation's self-pride.   
   It attacks our national self-respect. It destroys the seperation between   
   normal, righteous civilization, and the bestial, mentally-ill. For nobody can   
   say that a person who is so totally confused as to what their sexual gender   
   is, even though all they have to do is look down between their own legs while   
   in the shower and see for themselves, they can't even marry a person of the   
   opposite sex, is in their right mind.   
      
      
   Another thing; if these two sodomites prevail against this bakery, then no   
   business anywhere in this country can EVER lawfully refuse service to anyone   
   for ANY reason!   
      
      
   And lastly...no government or legislature can force an entire society to   
   accept the un-acceptable for very long.   
      
      
   True...the Soviet Union forced Russians and peoples of their satelite nations   
   to the will of the `Soviet' for 70 years or more. But America's a little   
   different. And at some point, someone in the crowd is gonna shout out `the   
   emperor isn't wearing any clothes'!   
      
      
      
      
      
      
   ---   
   *Durango b301 #PE*    
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)