Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    HOLYSMOKE    |    Religion Debate Echo    |    182 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 113 of 182    |
|    Earl Croasmun to Tim Richardson    |
|    Arizona discrimination    |
|    06 Mar 14 11:31:20    |
      > The First Amendment of the Constitution states:       > `Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or       > prohibiting the free exercise thereof;...'              Bakers are free to exercise their religion, just as anyone who operates a       public accommodation is free to exercise their religion. Unless that religion       tells a barber something like "you are forbidden to cut the hair of someone of       a different religion." If the barber wanted to discriminate, or felt that       their religion required them to discriminate, they should probably look for a       different line of work.              > If a Christian photographer doesn't want to violate their religion by       > photographing your sodomite wedding, thats their right to not violate their       >conciencous relilgious beliefs.              "Conscientious objector" status has some relevance to the military, but not to       photography. The wedding can happen with or without a photographer.                            --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1        * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca