REPLY: 139.fdn_ham@3:633/509 26735042   
   MSGID: 1:18/200@fidonet 620e67e1   
   CHRS: UTF-8 2   
   TZUTC: -0500   
   TID: MBSE-FIDO 1.0.8 (GNU/Linux-x86_64)   
   Hello deon,   
      
   17 Feb 22 20:47, you wrote to me:   
      
    de> CGNAT is an IPv4 solution due to the lack of IPv4 addresses - where   
    de> the answer is IPv6 isnt it?   
      
   Yes, you're right.  I stand corrected.   
      
    de> I've not heard of ISP's selling single static IPv6 addresses - I   
    de> thought most gave you a /64, /60 or /56 as part of the service you get   
    de> with them.   
      
   I wouldn't know.  Here in the US, it is exceedingly difficult to find a large    
   ISP that supports IPv6.  All of the large ISPs have a significant investment    
   in IPv4 with NAT/CGNAT and are -very- hesitant to change.   
      
   It's so much so that all of my computers have IPv6 disabled as there's no need    
   for it right now.   
      
   A side note: here's an interesting opinion article about why IPv6 hasn't had    
   wide adoption yet in the past 25 years of its existance:   
   https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/24/opinion_column_ipv6/   
      
   This is quickly becoming off-topic so netmail is welcome or we can move this    
   somewhere else.   
      
   Are you an amateur radio operator?   
      
   -- Sean KS4TD   
      
   ... America is the land of opportunity.  Everyone can become a taxpayer.   
   --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707   
    * Origin: Outpost BBS * Johnson City, TN (1:18/200)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 18/200 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131 129/305   
   SEEN-BY: 129/330 331 153/7715 226/30 227/114 229/110 200 206 312 317   
   SEEN-BY: 229/400 424 426 428 664 700 240/5832 266/512 282/1038 292/854   
   SEEN-BY: 301/1 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280   
   SEEN-BY: 712/848   
   PATH: 18/200 229/426